Radio Galaxy Zoo Talk

how are cataloged the presence of only one jet ?

  • roder53 by roder53

    I exclude the radio source at the top of the image, because it does not have a correspondent in the infrared.
    The other two radio sources have only one jet, one nice and simple and the other big.
    Question: how are cataloged the presence of only one jet?

    Posted

  • JeanTate by JeanTate in response to roder53's comment.

    To me, this is an asymmetric #doublelobe, with a faint core; the brighter lobe (SW) also has a faint jet leading to it, as can be seen in the FIRST image.

    The faint core is an IR object, very likely the z_ph ~0.66 SDSS J091454.32+192519.6.

    Posted

  • roder53 by roder53

    Ok, thanks a lot. But I understood: the weak core is a bright object, galaxy and its luminosity is weak for a considerable distance.
    The question is: what are these jets?
    My impression: it is not a black hole and then what are the radio images?

    Posted

  • JeanTate by JeanTate in response to roder53's comment.

    As I understand it, the jets are also plasma; what we see is electromagnetic radiation in the radio part of the spectrum, produced by the interaction of the very fast particles emitted by/in the polar jets of the AGN (active galactic nucleus), powered somehow by the SMBH, and the thin plasma through which it travels (in a tiny handful of objects, the jets are also visible in the optical and/or x-ray part of the the EM spectrum).

    At the distance of this object, and with the resolution of FIRST, even the host galaxy - which contains, at its center, the AGN - is just a 'point'; even for the closest AGN and highest resolution - M87 - the 'engine' (which is where the jets originate) is still just a point (though the galaxy is, obviously, well-resolved).

    There are a whole lot of GZ blog posts on radio galaxies, jets, lobes, etc; perhaps the best two to start with are The Curious Lives Of Radio Galaxies – Part One and
    The Curious Lives of Radio Galaxies – Part Two

    Posted

  • roder53 by roder53

    thank you very muchis now more clear

    Posted