Test thread (the title of which I can edit)
-
by JeanTate
JT's test thread, in which I get to try stuff out ...
Q1h5:
{weak nuclear, v. weak dl; probably artifact}Q1gg:
{clear nuc; noise elsewhere}Q16q:
{~noise everywhere}Q0yv:
{2 indep nucs, noise; interesting quenched gal!}Q1lh:
{noise; v faint dl?}Q0e2:
{noise}Q1lo:
{2 unrelated nuclear sources}Q174:
{nuc, noise; NVSS shows + sources?}Q2ay:
{nuc, noise}Q17l:
{2 unrelated nuclear sources}Posted
-
by JeanTate
32j0, DSS2 "Luptonized" (B/B, R/G, IR/R):
SDSS (same center, scale):
WISE (3.4/B, 4.6/G, 12/R):
From RADIO CONTOUR EXPLOSION:
Notes:
- I doubt the DSS2 data is flux; more likely (scanned) digitized density, so is some plate emulsion dependent non-linear function of flux (UPDATE: see below)
- which means that F = asinh (x/β) is not particularly good
- I = (r+g+b)/3, with rather coarse/crude clipping, for both DSS and WISE
- the sky is simply the field median, in all six cases
- the bi-modal colors of the WISE image suggests that another measure of I might be better
- the host - a QSO - is blue in both DSS and SDSS, but red (and bright!) in WISE! 😮
- the other bright red WISE source is a low-z inclined spiral galaxy; it's blue in DSS because of the stars, and red in WISE because of the dust (and cold gas?)
UPDATE (19 August, 2014): the SkyView DSS2 FITS headers state "Pixel values are given as scaled densities"
Posted
-
by JeanTate in response to JeanTate's comment.
After some editing, tweaking, etc of my code (WISE contours are band 1):
etc.
{Boilerplate}
Posted
-
by JeanTate
15jc, z_sp 0.453 SDSS J100457.45+400556.0 DONE
<>
0rn8, z_sp 0.096 SDSS J135152.97+465026.2 DONE
<>
36bv ? DONE; need 2nd go? (unlikely)
<>
2hem, z_sp 0.300 SDSS J083512.43+175441.0 DONE
<>
WaW 0dll, z_ph 0.56 SDSS J143631.89+541524.2 DONE
<>
3nwu, z_ph 0.12 SDSS J015744.20+024044.9 DONE; need 2nd go? (unlikely)
<>
1c36 ? DONE; need 2nd go? no
<>
08cq ? DONE; need 2nd go? (unlikely)
<>
2g9c, z_ph 0.35 SDSS J135837.03+182504.9 DONE
<>
1dhe, z_sp 0.205 SDSS J081235.97+360145.4 DONE
<>
1u5v, z_ph 0.31 SDSS J104459.45+280459.1 DONE
<>
29sx, z_sp 0.515 SDSS J165208.45+212526.2 DONE
<>
0o8d, z_ph 0.4 SDSS J154814.62+483502.0 DONE
<>
1n55, z_ph 0.25 SDSS J094103.62+312618.7 DONE
<>
13o3, z_sp 0.110 SDSS J131143.08+405859.7, 2MASX J13114312+4058596 DONE
<>
087m, z_ph 0.33 SDSS J105426.23+573649.1 DONE
<>
2g36, z_sp 0.232 SDSS J161627.36+182924.0 DONE
<>
3ayt, z_sp 0.030 SDSS J150700.55+071316.5 DONE
<>
3afk, z_sp 0.313 SDSS J144733.14+072451.4 DONE
<>
1xvf, z_sp 0.038 SDSS J142042.91+262503.2, extended in NVSS? DONE
<>
3pjj, z_sp 0.158 SDSS J110845.48+020240.8 DONE
<>
3fuz, z_ph 0.108 SDSS J204338.33+053134.8 DONE
<>
3k0q, z_ph 0.18 SDSS J231635.19+040518.3 DONE
<>
33ay, SDSS J111049.36+095307.1 DONE
<>
3mtv, z_ph 0.22 SDSS J234513.69+030508.8 DONE
<>
2hl6, SDSS J154209.91+174948.9 DONE
<>
20pk DONE
<>
2esi, SDSS J080601.51+190614.7 DONE
<>
2vai, SDSS J143948.32+121745.4 DONE
<>
3a3y, SDSS J155203.47+073141.9 DONE
<>
360p, DONE
<>
244x, DONE
<>
3mns, DONE
<>
11io, 2MASX J13332182+4208445 DONE
<>
1x80 DONE
<>
0gx5 ? DONE once; do zoomed-in DONE
<>
3284, z_sp 0.507 SDSS J222552.80+101316.7 re-do, zoomed in, lower NVSS threshold DONE
<>
2h1x, DONE
<>
05mb, SDSS J132931.31+592940.5 DONE
<>
2rea, SDSS J103419.92+134512.3 <>
2rea 72 <>
2rea 90 <>Posted
-
by JeanTate
Pieces of further automating and streamlining 'doublelobe spiral' (and other interesting) overlays*
07fk <>
07fk 54 <>0fyb <>
0fyb 54 <>2esa <>
2g0s (labelled "b") <>
3jjg <>
2da3 36 <>
36hs 54 <>
1182 36 <>
21nf 54 <>
26v8 24 <>
36bv <>
0d99 24 <>
0d99 30 <>
32pb <>
GZRS063 <>
GZRS082 <>
276c 36 <>
0gx5 <>
318m 24 <>
1vko <>
27yg <>
2da8 <>
1cfs 54 <>
1cfs 72 <>
1cfs 120 <>
1cfs <>
1cfsb 54 <>3o6c 54 <>
3o6c 36 <>*basically FIRST and/or NVSS contours on SDSS images
Posted
-
by JeanTate
29si <>
2yx8 <>
2lm2 24 <>
0uda 24 <>
01ju <>
2328 <>
0xud 36 <>
38ga <>
1g1q <>
3l57 24 <>
1iex 36 <>
205t <>
12p4 <>
3fax <>
1zgu <>
1zhx 24 <>
1r7v 36 <>
0j2i 24 <>
0z26 24 <>
3567 <>
0v85 <>
0498 54 <>
72 <>
90 <>
120 <>3abf 90 <>
Posted
-
by JeanTate
2ako <>
3eq2 <>
0t2i 24 <>
24od 54 <>
0rvo <>
0anx 24 <>
14oh <>
114d 54 <>
72 <>3jpi 54 <>
72 <>3nuv 24 <>
54 <>3gu2 24 <>
0xhv <>
x001 72 <>
GZRS082 72 <>
Posted
-
by JeanTate
Can you see me? (using G+ as 'cloud' photo storage)
Posted
-
by Dolorous_Edd in response to JeanTate's comment.
Yes, try dropbox also
Posted
-
by JeanTate in response to Dolorous Edd's comment.
Thanks!
I'd been using Photobucket, but after my browser got one too many adware infections, decided to look elsewhere. So far, Google/Picasa (now part of Google+) seems to work well, and I don't need to set up yet another account to manage. However, Picasa apparently - by default - 'enhances' photos; the image files I upload are all JPEGs (so far, anyway) - so the data is already, um, compromised - but I'm afraid the 'enhancement' may make astronomical images look worse (and I'm not sure I can disable 'enhancement' so that it never happens).
Have you used Dropbox? If so, are you happy with how it works (for 'cloud storing' RGZ images, to be posted into Talk posts)?
Posted
-
by JeanTate
114d(b) 72 <>
120 <>Posted
-
by Dolorous_Edd in response to JeanTate's comment.
Have you used Dropbox? If so, are you happy with how it works (for 'cloud storing' RGZ images, to be posted into Talk posts)?
Yes I do, all images I post are linked to Dropbox, didn't experience any troubles with it
It was just FYI, so use whatever you like ( in the end they are all the same )
I'm not sure I can disable 'enhancement'
Posted
-
by JeanTate in response to Dolorous Edd's comment.
Thanks again.
I was also able to disable 'awesome', which produced a looping 'video' (probably an animated GIF, or similar) of some of my contour overlay images; the only 'awesome' thing about it was just how awesomely horrible it was! 😉
I've used Google+/Picasa for several of the contour overlay images I've posted here; so far seems to have worked OK. I'll keep Dropbox in mind, in case I run out of space, or need a backup.
Posted
-
by JeanTate in response to Dolorous Edd's comment.
3k9d 180 <>
240 <>0l1t <>
2o5i 24 <>
1mml <>
0ve1 24 <>
1idj <>
3mbk 24 <>
e020 <>
03xq 30 <>
e015 <>
e016 <>
e027 90 <>
e020b <54 >
2rea 180 <>
3284 90 <>
22jc 240 <>
2h1x 54 <>
e030 36 <>
Posted
-
by JeanTate
SDRAGN candidates with z_sp. Numbers after thumbnail are z_sp, fracDeV_r, c(r), ellipticity (r), and petroRad_r
< 0.06 0.23 0.387 0 4.2
0.11 0.67 0.343 0 6.2
0.158 1.00 0.395 0 7.6
0.211 1.00 0.400 0 1.7
0.405 0.87 0.342 0 4.5
0.098 0.60 0.338 1 5.5
0.189 1.00 0.315 1 7.5
0.313 1.00 0.338 1 3.0
0.507 1.00 0.394 1 4.4
0.047 0.06 0.427 2 4.3
0.118 1.00 0.315 2 11.4
0.14 0.93 0.337 2 13.7
0.162 1.00 0.339 2 3.2
0.205 1.00 0.313 2 4.8
0.221 0.92 0.361 2 3.7
0.285 0.76 0.351 2 6.4
0.312 1.00 0.303 2 2.6
0.351 1.00 0.386 2 4.9
0.515 1.00 0.347 2 3.4
0.035 0.58 0.360 3 20.4
0.038 1.00 0.311 3 9.3
0.145 0.65 0.396 3 7.0
0.146 0.91 0.360 3 4.1
0.172 1.00 0.330 3 3.7
0.203 1.00 0.340 3 3.5
0.307 1.00 0.300 3 9.7
0.499 0.39 0.492 3 5.8
0.096 1.00 0.338 4 5.1
0.176 1.00 0.327 4 2.6
0.198 0.53 0.455 4 2.5
0.209 1.00 0.310 4 4.4
0.512 0.70 0.385 4 3.7
0.559 0.00 0.482 4 4.1
0.149 0.31 0.405 5 4.1
0.238 0.85 0.403 5 3.9
0.275 0.21 0.399 5 4.0
0.453 0.99 0.397 5 3.6
0.032 0.36 0.392 6 15.3
0.044 0.17 0.395 6 8.9
0.154 0.78 0.364 6 3.5
0.033 0.00 0.405 7 8.9
0.049 0.06 0.415 7 10.4
0.057 0.78 0.329 7 8.5
0.316 0.98 0.342 7 4.0Posted
-
by JeanTate
SDRAGN candidates with z_ph. Numbers after thumbnail are z_ph, fracDeV_r, c(r), ellipticity (r), and petroRad_r
< 0.1 0.33 0.416 3 3.4
0.1 0.20 0.410 5 4.2
0.105 0.00 0.450 6 2.4
0.108 0.38 0.457 7 2.9
0.11 1.00 0.367 5 4.2
0.12 0.35 0.394 7 3.4
0.125 1.00 0.363 1 6.6
0.13 0.26 0.336 6 3.2
0.134 0.00 0.532 0 5.3
0.16 0.41 0.460 1 5.9
0.16 0.76 0.346 7 5.6
0.16 0.76 0.459 6 2.2
0.165 0.09 0.405 9 2.6
0.165 0.91 0.361 7 2.5
0.17 0.60 0.519 2 3.0
0.18 1.00 0.359 1 2.7
0.19 0.59 0.375 1 3.4
0.2 0.00 0.538 6 2.9
0.2 0.93 0.383 1 3.1
0.21 0.78 0.422 4 2.4
0.23 1.00 0.334 4 4.1
0.237 0.37 0.457 7 4.2
0.24 0.00 0.498 9 3.4
0.25 0.21 0.394 7 4.2
0.256 0.76 0.318 4 4.5
0.26 0.30 0.398 2 4.9
0.26 1.00 0.432 4 3.3
0.28 0.24 0.388 4 3.7
0.28 0.34 0.471 4 7.4
0.28 0.15 0.388 3 4.1
0.285 0.13 0.432 8 1.9
0.29 0.16 0.514 3 5.2
0.33 0.06 0.498 5 6.2
0.33 0.25 0.428 6 2.3
0.33 1.00 0.394 4 8.2
0.34 0.72 0.354 0 3.4
0.345 0.00 0.597 4 2.7
0.35 0.00 0.574 3 1.5
0.358 0.99 0.367 5 5.0
0.39 0.81 0.360 3 5.8
0.4 1.00 0.329 5 4.2
0.42 0.64 0.367 2 3.7
0.439 0.20 0.405 7 3.7
0.45 0.00 0.499 8 2.3
0.465 0.17 0.379 5 6.4
0.61 1.00 0.311 0 1.8
0.63 0.44 0.392 6 18.0Posted
-
by JeanTate
"obvious AGN?" The 33:
< 0.285 0.76 0.351 2 6.4
0.221 0.92 0.361 2 3.7
0.096 1.00 0.338 4 5.1
0.312 1.00 0.303 2 2.6
0.39 0.81 0.360 3 5.8
0.14 0.93 0.337 2 13.7
0.203 1.00 0.340 3 3.5
0.11 0.67 0.343 0 6.2
0.23 1.00 0.334 4 4.1
0.205 1.00 0.313 2 4.8
0.405 0.87 0.342 0 4.5
0.125 1.00 0.363 1 6.6
0.61 1.00 0.311 0 1.8
0.2 0.93 0.383 1 3.1
0.038 1.00 0.311 3 9.3
0.19 0.59 0.375 1 3.4
0.42 0.64 0.367 2 3.7
0.256 0.76 0.318 4 4.5
0.035 0.58 0.360 3 20.4
0.176 1.00 0.327 4 2.6
0.118 1.00 0.315 2 11.4
0.307 1.00 0.300 3 9.7
0.515 1.00 0.347 2 3.4
0.098 0.60 0.338 1 5.5
0.146 0.91 0.360 3 4.1
0.172 1.00 0.330 3 3.7
0.34 0.72 0.354 0 3.4
0.512 0.70 0.385 4 3.7
0.313 1.00 0.338 1 3.0
0.189 1.00 0.315 1 7.5
0.18 1.00 0.359 1 2.7
0.209 1.00 0.310 4 4.4
0.162 1.00 0.339 2 3.2>The extra 10; e+g:
< 0.198 0.53 0.455 4 2.5
0.351 1.00 0.386 2 4.9
0.211 1.00 0.400 0 1.7
0.507 1.00 0.394 1 4.4
0.145 0.65 0.396 3 7.0
0.158 1.00 0.395 0 7.6>fair:
< 0.33 1.00 0.394 4 8.2
0.26 1.00 0.432 4 3.3
0.21 0.78 0.422 4 2.4
0.17 0.60 0.519 2 3.0Posted
-
by JeanTate
some sanity checks
e033 <>
e034 <>
and some extras
1o9k <>
1tqe <>
35wv <>
e039 90 <>
Posted
-
by JeanTate
check this out
e044 36 <>
e045x004 36 <>e045 <>
e047 36 <>
e048 <>
e049 <>
554365 1214
655620 407
581641 367
173420 299
651554 281
555930 134
656675 125
654810 96
587501 89
587541 86
652327 80
180577 73
176072 70
177265 62
581654 62
182902 57
572636 56
553260 53
555952 52
583788 51
582738 50
570189 43
654808 224
181871 61NPosted
-
by JeanTate
212 <>
213 <>
214 <>
215 <>
216 <>
217 <>
219 <>
220 <>
221 <>
222 <>
223 <>
224 <>
225 <>
227 <>
228 <>
229 <>
230 <>
231 <>
232 <>
233 <>
234 <>
235 <>
237 <>
238 <>
239 <>
240 <>
241 <>
242 <>
243 <>
244 <>
245 <>
246 <>
247 <>
248 <>
249 <>
250 <>
251 <>
252 <>
253 <>
254 <>
255 <>
257 <>
258 <>
259 <>
260 <>
261 <>
262 <>
263 <>
264 <>
265 <>
266 <>
269 <>
270 <>
272 <>
273 <>
218 <>221 <>
253 <>
e092 <>
e093 <>
253b <>Posted
-
by JeanTate
3l57 <>
Generic boilerplate: Background image is SDSS per http://skyservice.pha.jhu.edu/DR10/ImgCutout/getjpeg.aspx. FIRST (red) contours are derived from FITS files produced using SkyView with Python code described in this RGZ Talk thread. Physical scale bar (cyan) represents projected distance at redshift (lime), assuming a ΛCDM cosmological model with parameter values of ΩM 0.27, ΩΛ 0.73, and H0 71 kms-1Mpc-1. The image center (J2000.0) is the SDSS galaxy [); z_sp (z_ph) its spectroscopic (photometric) redshift.
Posted
-
by JeanTate
0.021-0.035
120
<218
219
166
151
231
098
200
047
196 >The image(s) in this post was (were) created from sources, and using methods, described in this RGZ Talk post. The objects at the center of the images are {X}.
Posted
-
by JeanTate
0.038-0.070
146
204
213
011
008
172
100
004
244
247The image(s) in this post was (were) created from sources, and using methods, described in this RGZ Talk post. The objects at the center of the images are {X}.
Posted
-
by JeanTate
0.070-0.100
037
214
005
253
217
010
099
208
105
116The image(s) in this post was (were) created from sources, and using methods, described in this RGZ Talk post. The objects at the center of the images are {X}.
Posted
-
by JeanTate
0.100-0.130
162
029
157
234
085
160
198
133
121
016The image(s) in this post was (were) created from sources, and using methods, described in this RGZ Talk post. The objects at the center of the images are {X}.
Posted
-
by JeanTate
0.131-0.170
270
232
044
257
156
246
258
179
020
046The image(s) in this post was (were) created from sources, and using methods, described in this RGZ Talk post. The objects at the center of the images are {X}.
Posted
-
by JeanTate
0.182-0.200
042
256
184
021
113
190
242
088
115
170The image(s) in this post was (were) created from sources, and using methods, described in this RGZ Talk post. The objects at the center of the images are {X}.
Posted
-
by JeanTate
0.200-0.220
240
028
187
155
255
243
095
177
189
205The image(s) in this post was (were) created from sources, and using methods, described in this RGZ Talk post. The objects at the center of the images are {X}.
Posted
-
by JeanTate
0.220-0.237
033
273
238
203
134
135
216
035
148
108The image(s) in this post was (were) created from sources, and using methods, described in this RGZ Talk post. The objects at the center of the images are {X}.
Posted
-
by JeanTate
0.238-0.270
104
180
235
248
265
072
086
260
081
223The image(s) in this post was (were) created from sources, and using methods, described in this RGZ Talk post. The objects at the center of the images are {X}.
Posted
-
by JeanTate
0.270-0.290
236
251
089
215
127
159
207
237
038
211The image(s) in this post was (were) created from sources, and using methods, described in this RGZ Talk post. The objects at the center of the image are {X}.
Posted
-
by JeanTate
0.290-0.322
254
054
169
269
030
128
053
220
222
250The image(s) in this post was (were) created from sources, and using methods, described in this RGZ Talk post. The objects at the center of the image are {X}.
Posted
-
by JeanTate
OP:
This post: Brief outline
Second post: Brief description of what's in the contour overlay images
Third post: How I produced the contour overlay images
Fourth post: What this thread's about
This OP is brief, because once posted, I cannot subsequently edit it (apparently)
New one line boilerplate (to be put at the end of all posts containing contour overlay images):
The image(s) in this post were created from sources, and methods, described in this RGZ Talk post [link to the OP of the 'About Contour Overlay Images' thread]. The object at the center of the image is [link to SDSS Explore webpage; not sure what to do about objects which are not SDSS ones. This short sentence is omitted if there is no object at the center.]
Brief description of what's in the contour overlay images (i.e. the second post of the new thread).
The background image is:
- an SDSS image, per http://skyservice.pha.jhu.edu/DR10/ImgCutout/getjpeg.aspx, or
- a "Luptonized" WISE image (3.4μ, 4.6μ, and 12μ bands), or
- a "Luptonized" DSS2 image (derived from B, R, and IR plates).
The details of how "Luptonized" images were created are in the next post.
The color contours are derived from FITS files produces using SkyView with Python code described in the next post.
Unless otherwise noted, the color of the contours indicates the source:
- red: FIRST
- cyan: NVSS
- lime: WISE, 3.4μ band
- yellow: VLSSr
RA and Dec coordinates are J2000.0.
z_sp (z_ph) is the spectroscopic (photometric) redshift of the object in the center of the image, per SDSS (or other source, as noted). If the image is not centered on an object, or if there is no reliable redshift of a centered object, the text "z_ph N/A" is used.
If there is a physical scale bar, in cyan, it represents (to the nearest kpc) projected distance at a redshift of z_sp/z_ph (in lime), assuming a ΛCDM cosmological model with parameter values of ΩM 0.27, ΩΛ 0.73, and H0 71 kms-1Mpc-1.
How I produced the contour overlay images (i.e. third post in the new thread) - WIP (needs more work)
Contours produced from FITS files.
FITS header: RA, Dec, size (pixels), scale, orientation. Used to produce text (scale bar, orientation vectors) overlaid on image.
Redshift - spectroscopic, photometric, or "N/A" - an independent input.
'Zero', a.k.a. 'sky', defined as the median flux.
Noise is modeled using the MAD (median absolute deviation) statistic, with the 'noise floor' being an input (number of sigmas).
Smoothing is Gaussian, using an input smoothing parameter (ndimage.gaussian_filter the Python scipy submodule)
Contour scale factor is also input; common values are √2 and √3.
More details - including how I came to develop this Python code - are in this RGZ Talk thread.
"Luptonized" images
To "Luptonize" is to produce an RGB JPEG colorized using the method described in Lupton+ 2004, "Preparing Red-Green-Blue Images from CCD Data" (arXiv preprint here).
The three WISE bands I use are:
- 3.4μ mapped to B,
- 4.6μ mapped to G, and
- 12μ mapped to R
And the three DSS2 are:
- B mapped to B,
- R mapped to G, and
- IR mapped to R.
I use one of two methods for defining I ("intensity", some sort of measure of total flux, combining all three bands):
- (by far the most common method) take the DN (WISE)/[?] (DSS2) values in the FITS files downloaded from SkyView
- (a method I use rarely) normalize so that the max value in each band is the same (after removing the sky, and whatever 'noise floor' above the sky).
The Python code I wrote, to produce the Luptonized images, is similar to that described above; in particular, the 'sky' is the median, and the 'noise floor' sigma (calculated using the MAD statistic) multiplied by a small number (typically between 1.0 and 3.5).
For f(I) I use asinh, log, or linear.
Here are two Luptonized images of the above field, produced using these two methods (same f(I) - asinh - same m and M, same β, etc), respectively:
This post: What this thread's about ...
I have posted many 'contour overlay images' here in RGZ Talk, for example (source):
Most, if not all, posts which contain such images also contain a 'boilerplate' slab of text, at the bottom of the post; these boilerplates are a few words about the piece of sky in the image, the parts of the electromagnetic spectrum they portray, the identity of the cental object, its redshift, the source of the data used to produce the image, and so on.
Rather than an increasingly large chunk of text, and a growing one too (as I add features, the generic boilerplate grows too), I plan to have a really simple footnote. To the effect of "click here for details of image, including an explanation of what's in it and how it was created". This thread - specifically the first post in it -
will beis that "here". 😃As my contour overlay images become more diverse (shall we say), I'll edit the posts in this thread.
Oh, and the thread FIRST and/or NVSS contours on SDSS images contains lists of the images I've posted (and some posted by others too), with links. Despite its title, included are overlays with other than FIRST and/or NVSS contours; and on images other than SDSS ... 😉
Posted
-
by JeanTate in response to JeanTate's comment.
Now here's a surprise! 😮
The post (above) which I just posted, I now cannot edit!! 😮 😮
(apparently)
UPDATE: Or not; I can now edit it. Why the wait?
However, I STILL cannot edit the OP of the thread I created October 23 2014 12:00 PM (I won't link to it, because I intend to delete - "Remove" in Talk-speak - it later)
Posted
-
by JeanTate
1fbj 90 <>
1wdx 108 <>
x005 72 <>
x006 72 <>Posted
-
by JeanTate
1xvf 123 1 <>
363 1 <>
3l57 123 2 <>
089t 123 3 <> 24 3 <>
16al 123 7 <>
2rzn 123 8 <>
2a48 123 9 <>
3m41 123 10 <>
2hyr 123 11 <>
2d5c 123 12 <>
2dx9 243 13 <>
1l5p 123 14 <>
2dgn 123 15 <>
1hmw 123 16 <>
14kv 123 17 <>
0mt7 123 18 <>
2tos 123 19 <>
1c5f 123 20 <>
2dx9 123 21 <>Posted
-
by JeanTate
303 36 <>
303 24 <>
302 18 <>
o002 108 <>
o002 500 <>
e098 18 <>
e102 18 <>
305 18 <>
306 18 <>Posted
-
by JeanTate
286 18 <>
291 24 <>
311 18 <>
312 18 <>
315 18 <>
e105 18 <>
e107 24 <>
e108 18 <>
e109 18 <>
e110 24 <>
314 24 <>
e104 18 <>
e111 24 <>
e112 18 <>
e113 18 <>
317 18 <>
e114 24 <>
e115 36 <>
318 24 <>
321 18 <>
324 36 <>
e116 36 <>
e117 36 <>
325 36 <>
e118 36 <>
324 54 <>
325 54 <>
e118 54 <>
321 36 <>
Posted
-
by JeanTate
Waw:
w001 3jyp 18 <>
w003 2y1m 18 <>
w005 1qy6 36 <>
w006 2zog 18 <>Posted
-
by JeanTate
GZf:
e119 <36 >
e120 36 <>
e121 36 <>
e122 24 <>
e123 24 <>
e124 <>
e125 <>
e126 54 <>
e127 36 <>
e128 <>
e129 36 <>
e130 54 <>
e131 24 <>
e132 24 <>
e123 18 <>
e133 54 <>
e134 24 <>
e135 24 <>
e136 36 <>
e137 36 <>
e138 54 <>
e139 54 <>
e140 24 <>
e141 24 <>
e142 54 <>
e143 36 <>
e144 72 <>
e145 36 <>
e146 54 <>
e147 36 <>
e148 72 <>
e149 72 <>
e150 54 <>
e151 54 <>
e152 54 <>
e130 72 <>
e133 24 <>
e134 54 <>
e135 54 <>
e136 72 <>
e137 72 <>
e138 90 <>
e140 54 <>
e141 54 <>
e143 54 <>
e144 108 <>
e145 72 <>
e146 90 <>
e147 72 <>
e148 108 <>
e149 108 <>
e150 24 <>
e151 90 <>
e152 90 <>
Posted
-
by JeanTate
S'nT
328 <>
e153 24 <>
e154 54 <>
e155 <>
330 <>
e117_b 18 <>
e117_c 72 <>
e117_d 18 <>
e157 <>
e158 24 <>
e159 <>
e160 <>
e161 <>
e162 <>
e163 36 <>
e166 <>
e167 <>
e168 <>
342 <>
343 36 <>
335 <>
e162 <>
e159 24 <>
e169 <>
e171 <>
e172 <>
347 <>
e173 <>
350 <>
351 <>
e175 <>
e176 <>
e177 <>
e178 <>
353 <>
e178 <>
e179 <>
e180 <>
e181 <>
e182 <>
e183 <>
Posted
-
by JeanTate
QbyR
q001 <>
K254 120 <>
Q785b <>
e184 <>
e185 <>
SDA0236 <>
<>
<>
<>
The images in this post was created from sources, and using methods, described in this RGZ Talk post. The object at the center of the image is SDSS J081525.77+372025.8.
Posted